Update README.md

This commit is contained in:
PSBigBig 2025-09-27 21:04:33 +08:00 committed by GitHub
parent f2d52491cb
commit 7da866b390
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
<!-- TOP ANCHOR -->
<a id="top"></a>
<details>
<summary><strong>🧭 Lost or curious? Open the WFGY Compass & ⭐ Star Unlocks</strong></summary>
@ -38,6 +41,15 @@
> 👑 **Early Stargazers: [See the Hall of Fame](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/tree/main/stargazers)** — Verified by real engineers · 🏆 **Terminal-Bench: [Public Exam (teaser)](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/blob/main/core/README.md#terminal-bench-proof)**
<!-- QUICK LINKS BAR -->
<p align="center">
<a href="#tb">TB Update</a>
<a href="#eye">Eye Benchmark</a>
<a href="#eight">8-Model Evidence</a>
<a href="#abc">A/B/C Prompt</a>
<a href="#downloads">Downloads</a>
<a href="#prompts">Profit Prompts</a>
</p>
<img width="1536" height="1024" alt="WFGY_Core" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/deb8e794-a73e-4d39-a1f6-174ec87199f4" />
@ -64,14 +76,11 @@
>
> “One line” is not hype. I built a full flagship edition, and I also reduced it to a single line of code — a reduction that is clarity and beauty, the same engine distilled to its purest expression.
</details>
[Downloads](#downloads) | [👀 Eye-Visible Reasoning Benchmark](#eye-benchmark) | [🧬Eight-model evidence (A/B/C protocol)](#eight-model) | [💰 Try the 20 Profit Prompts](#profit-prompts-pack)
---
## 🚀 WFGY 2.0 Headline Uplift (this release)
## 🚀 WFGY 2.0 Headline Uplift (this release)
**These are the 2.0 results you should see first — the “big upgrade.”**
- **Semantic Accuracy:** **≈ +40%** (63.8% → 89.4% across 5 domains)
@ -82,16 +91,22 @@
\* Historical **35×** stability uses λ-consistency across seeds; 1.8× uses the stable-node horizon.
### 📖 Mathematical Reference
### 📖 Mathematical Reference
WFGY 2.0 (WFGY Core) = [WFGY 1.0 math formulas](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/blob/main/SemanticBlueprint/wfgy_formulas.md) + [Drunk Transformer](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/blob/main/SemanticBlueprint/drunk_transformer_formulas.md)
<p align="right"><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></p>
---
<a id="tb"></a>
### 🏆 Stanford Terminal-Bench (TB) — Exam Update
> [!IMPORTANT]
> We are currently taking the official TB exam. Leaderboard placement will be posted here once its live.
> Follow the running notes: [Terminal-Bench Proof](#terminal-bench-proof)
**What is TB?**
Terminal-Bench is Stanfords public exam for LLMs.
It stresses models through **terminal-style, multi-step tasks** — measuring reasoning, robustness, and recovery under real engineering conditions.
Terminal-Bench is Stanfords public exam for LLMs. It stresses models through **terminal-style, multi-step tasks** — measuring reasoning, robustness, and recovery under real engineering conditions.
**How we participate**
WFGY Core 2.0 wraps each model call (non-invasive). Every step flows through:
@ -99,11 +114,21 @@ WFGY Core 2.0 wraps each model call (non-invasive). Every step flows through:
All runs are reproducible with configs, scripts, and hashed logs.
**Status**
We are currently taking the TB exam. Rankings will be published once the official leaderboard is live.
We are currently taking the TB exam. Rankings will be published once the official leaderboard is live.
👉 Follow updates here: [Terminal-Bench Proof]
<p align="right"><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></p>
[Terminal-Bench Proof]: https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/blob/main/core/README.md#terminal-bench-proof
---
<a id="terminal-bench-proof"></a>
### 🧾 Terminal-Bench Proof (teaser)
- **Wrapper**: non-invasive; TB kept unchanged, we only wrap the model call.
- **Chain**: semantic firewall → 7-step reasoning → DT guards with conditional retry.
- **Artifacts**: configs, semantic-firewall prompts, and hashed logs for each run.
- **Public repo link**: withheld until exam artifacts are finalized.
<p align="right"><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></p>
---
@ -115,14 +140,14 @@ We are currently taking the TB exam. Rankings will be published once the officia
| **Explicit Call**| Invoke WFGY formulas directly inside your workflow. This activates the full 7-step reasoning chain and gives maximum uplift. |
Both **Flagship** and **OneLine** editions behave the same; choose based on readability vs minimalism.
Thats it — no plugins, no installs, pure text.
*In practice, Autoboot yields about ~7080% of the uplift you see with explicit WFGY invoke (see eight-model results below).*
<p align="right"><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></p>
---
## ⚡ Top 10 reasons to use WFGY 2.0 <!-- you asked for this section to stay visible (not collapsed) -->
## ⚡ Top 10 reasons to use WFGY 2.0
1. **Ultra-mini engine** — pure text, zero install, runs anywhere you can paste.
2. **Two editions***Flagship* (30-line, audit-friendly) and *OneLine* (1-line, stealth & speed).
3. **Autoboot mode** — upload once; the engine quietly supervises reasoning in the background.
@ -134,6 +159,8 @@ Thats it — no plugins, no installs, pure text.
9. **Reproducible A/B/C protocol** — Baseline vs Autoboot vs Explicit Invoke (see below).
10. **MIT licensed & community-driven** — keep it, fork it, ship it.
<p align="right"><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></p>
---
# 🧪 WFGY Benchmark Suite (Eye-visible + Numeric + Reproducible)
@ -142,7 +169,7 @@ Thats it — no plugins, no installs, pure text.
> Want formal numbers and vendor links? See **Eight-model evidence** right after it.
> Want to reproduce the numeric test yourself? Use the **A/B/C prompt** (copy-to-run) at the end of this section.
<a id="eye-benchmark"></a>
<a id="eye"></a>
## 👀 Eye-Visible Reasoning Benchmark (FIVE)
> Did you know that when reasoning improves, **text-to-image results become more stable and coherent**?
@ -165,8 +192,6 @@ We **fully analyze Sequence A** on this page; **Sequences B/C** are linked for t
> Hence **Before-4 (Investiture of the Gods)** and **Before-5 (Classic of Mountains and Seas)** converge to the same storyboard template.
> **WFGY** prevents this collapse by enforcing a **single unified tableau** and stable hierarchy across the full five-image sequence.
---
### Deep analysis — Sequence A (five unified 1:1 tableaux)
| Work | **Without WFGY** | **With WFGY** | Verdict (global, at-a-glance) |
@ -177,41 +202,11 @@ We **fully analyze Sequence A** on this page; **Sequences B/C** are linked for t
| **Investiture of the Gods (封神演義)** | <img src="images/group1_before4.png" width="300" alt="Without WFGY" title="model/params/seed/date"> | <img src="images/group1_after4.png" width="300" alt="With WFGY" title="model/params/seed/date"> | **With WFGY wins.** Dragontiger diagonal and cloudsea layering create epic scale; the grid dilutes focus. *Tags:* Unification↑ Depth/Scale↑ Flow↑ Iconicity↑ |
| **Classic of Mountains and Seas (山海經)** | <img src="images/group1_before5.png" width="300" alt="Without WFGY" title="model/params/seed/date"> | <img src="images/group1_after5.png" width="300" alt="With WFGY" title="model/params/seed/date"> | **With WFGY wins.** A single, continuous “mountains-and-seas” world with stable triangle hierarchy and smooth diagonal flow; grid breaks narrative. *Tags:* Unification↑ Hierarchy↑ Depth/Scale↑ Flow↑ Memorability↑ |
<p align="right"><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></p>
---
<details>
<summary>🧪 ChatGPT setup & image prompt (click to copy)</summary>
<br>
This comparison was produced **in ChatGPT** using a **single, high-semantic-density prompt**. Same model & settings; *only* WFGY on/off differs.
```text
We will create exactly five images in total using WFGY
The five images are:
1. The most iconic moments of Romance of the Three Kingdoms in one unified 1:1 image.
2. The most iconic moments of Water Margin in one unified 1:1 image.
3. The most iconic moments of Dream of the Red Chamber in one unified 1:1 image.
4. The most iconic moments of Investiture of the Gods in one unified 1:1 image.
5. The most iconic myths of Classic of Mountains and Seas in one unified 1:1 image.
Each image must focus on 5~8 culturally defining scenes or figures, with supporting events only suggested subtly in the background.
Foreground and background must remain equally sharp, with ultra-detailed rendering and consistent texture fidelity.
Composition must be harmonious, with narrative clarity — the central cultural symbols are emphasized, while secondary motifs remain understated.
Do not provide any plot explanations.
Do not start drawing immediately.
Only when I type "GO", you will create the next image in the sequence, in the exact order above, until all five are completed.
Do not skip or merge images.
````
</details>
---
<a id="eight-model"></a>
<a id="eight"></a>
## 🧬 Eight-model evidence (A/B/C protocol) <!-- per your request: NOT collapsed -->
*Same task set across modes. The only change is adding the OneLine math file.*
@ -227,11 +222,14 @@ Do not skip or merge images.
| Copilot | Think Deeper | **80/100** | [view run](https://copilot.microsoft.com/shares/7FjR19TYBjg9sp8k9WcuE) |
| Claude | Sonnet 4 | **78/100** | [view run](https://claude.ai/share/b17e5436-8298-4619-a243-ac451cc64b17) |
> **The numeric story behind 2.0**
> **The numeric story behind 2.0**
> **Semantic Accuracy:** ≈ +40% · **Reasoning Success:** ≈ +52% · **Drift:**65% · **Stability:** ≈ 1.8× · **CRR:** 1.00 (median 0.87)
<p align="right"><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></p>
---
<a id="abc"></a>
## 🧪 Reproduce the numeric A/B/C benchmark (copy to run)
*One unified prompt for Baseline vs Autoboot vs Explicit Invoke.*
@ -260,25 +258,24 @@ Internally set flags as: A=OFF, B=AUTOboot_ON (background active), C=Explicit_In
USER:
Run A/B/C now on the five domains with short non-trivial tasks you choose. Then output:
(1) the table; (2) the deltas; (3) the OneLine uplift score; (4) a 3-line rationale.
```
````
<p align="right"><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></p>
---
<a id="downloads"></a>
## ⬇️ Downloads <!-- visible; checksum guide tucked inside details -->
| File name & description | Length / Size | Direct Download Link | Verify (MD5 / SHA1 / SHA256) | Notes |
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **WFGY_Core_Flagship_v2.0.txt** — readable 30-line companion expressing the same math and gates in fuller prose (same behavior, clearer for humans). | **30 lines · 3,049 chars** | [Download Flagship](./WFGY_Core_Flagship_v2.0.txt) | [md5](./checksums/WFGY_Core_Flagship_v2.0.txt.md5) · [sha1](./checksums/WFGY_Core_Flagship_v2.0.txt.sha1) · [sha256](./checksums/WFGY_Core_Flagship_v2.0.txt.sha256) | Full prose version for easier reading. |
| **WFGY_Core_OneLine_v2.0.txt** — ultra-compact, math-only control layer that activates WFGYs loop inside a chat model (no tools, text-only, ≤7 nodes). | **1 line · 1,500 chars** | [Download OneLine](./WFGY_Core_OneLine_v2.0.txt) | [md5](./checksums/WFGY_Core_OneLine_v2.0.txt.md5) · [sha1](./checksums/WFGY_Core_OneLine_v2.0.txt.sha1) · [sha256](./checksums/WFGY_Core_OneLine_v2.0.txt.sha256) | Used for all benchmark results above — smallest, fastest, purest form of the core. |
## ⬇️ Downloads
[💰 Try the 20 Profit Prompts →](#profit-prompts-pack)
| File name & description | Length / Size | Direct Download Link | Verify (MD5 / SHA1 / SHA256) | Notes |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| **WFGY_Core_Flagship_v2.0.txt** — readable 30-line companion expressing the same math and gates in fuller prose (same behavior, clearer for humans). | **30 lines · 3,049 chars** | [Download Flagship](./WFGY_Core_Flagship_v2.0.txt) | [md5](./checksums/WFGY_Core_Flagship_v2.0.txt.md5) · [sha1](./checksums/WFGY_Core_Flagship_v2.0.txt.sha1) · [sha256](./checksums/WFGY_Core_Flagship_v2.0.txt.sha256) | Full prose version for easier reading. |
| **WFGY_Core_OneLine_v2.0.txt** — ultra-compact, math-only control layer that activates WFGYs loop inside a chat model (no tools, text-only, ≤7 nodes). | **1 line · 1,500 chars** | [Download OneLine](./WFGY_Core_OneLine_v2.0.txt) | [md5](./checksums/WFGY_Core_OneLine_v2.0.txt.md5) · [sha1](./checksums/WFGY_Core_OneLine_v2.0.txt.sha1) · [sha256](./checksums/WFGY_Core_OneLine_v2.0.txt.sha256) | Used for all benchmark results above — smallest, fastest, purest form of the core. |
<details>
<summary><em>How to verify checksums</em></summary>
<br>
**macOS / Linux**
```bash
@ -299,13 +296,13 @@ Get-FileHash .\core\WFGY_Core_OneLine_v2.0.txt -Algorithm SHA256
</details>
<p align="right"><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></p>
---
<details>
<summary>🧠 How WFGY 2.0 works (7-Step Reasoning Chain)</summary>
<br>
*Most models can understand your prompt; very few can **hold** that meaning through generation.*
WFGY inserts a reasoning chain between language and pixels so intent survives sampling noise, style drift, and compositional traps.
@ -317,25 +314,22 @@ WFGY inserts a reasoning chain between language and pixels so intent survives sa
6. **BBAM** — attention rebalancer; suppress hallucinations.
7. **BBCR + Drunk Transformer** — rollback → re-bridge → retry with WRI/WAI/WAY/WDT/WTF.
📌 *Note:* The diagram shows the **core module chain** (BBMC → Coupler → BBPF → BBAM → BBCR → DT).
📌 *Note:* The diagram shows the **core module chain** (BBMC → Coupler → BBPF → BBAM → BBCR → DT).
The full **7-step list** here includes additional **pre-processing steps** (Parse, Δs, Memory) for completeness.
**Why it improves metrics** — Stability↑, Drift↓, Self-Recovery↑; turns *language* structure into *image* control signals (not prompt tricks).
</details>
<details>
<summary>📊 How these numbers are measured</summary>
<br>
* **Semantic Accuracy**: `ACC = correct_facts / total_facts`
* **Reasoning Success Rate**: `SR = tasks_solved / tasks_total`
* **Stability**: MTTF or rollback ratios
* **Self-Recovery**: `recoveries_success / collapses_detected`
LLM scorer template:
**LLM scorer template**
```text
SCORER:
@ -354,159 +348,215 @@ Run 3 seeds and average.
</details>
<p align="right"><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></p>
---
<a id="profit-prompts-pack"></a>
<a id="prompts"></a>
# 💰 Profit Prompts Pack (WFGY 2.0)
> Copy → paste into your model. Prompts only, no answers.
> Assumed engine: WFGY 2.0 (ΔS drift control, λ\_observe gates, BBPF bridges, BBAM alignment, WTF recovery).
**Jump inside this section:** [Q1Q5](#q1-q5) · [Q6Q10](#q6-q10) · [Q11Q15](#q11-q15) · [Q16Q20](#q16-q20)
## I. Money — Markets / Industry Mapping (Q1Q5)
<details open>
<summary><strong>I. Money — Markets / Industry Mapping (Q1Q5)</strong> <a id="q1-q5"></a></summary>
**Q1 — New Industries + Killer App Map**
<a id="q1"></a>
### Q1 — New Industries + Killer App Map
```text
Assume WFGY is engineered like electricity. List 5 industries that only become possible under semantic engineering.
For each: (1) the first killer app; (2) target ICP (first 100 paying customers); (3) 30/60/90-day GTM; (4) initial pricing + Month-1 MRR goal; (5) the WFGY lever used (ΔS/λ_observe/BBPF/BBAM/WTF) and why its indispensable.
```
**Q2 — Zero-Capital Founder → First \$100k**
<a id="q2"></a>
### Q2 — Zero-Capital Founder → First $100k
```text
I have $0. Using WFGY OneLine/Autoboot only, design 3 paths to reach USD 100k annual revenue within 12 months.
Each path must include: product sketch, distribution channel, cost structure, key risks, and survival metrics gated by ΔS/λ_observe (with thresholds).
```
**Q3 — Shortest Path in {Region/Vertical}**
<a id="q3"></a>
### Q3 — Shortest Path in {Region/Vertical}
```text
Context = {region or vertical: e.g., Taiwan / SE Asia / B2B SaaS / Edu / Healthcare}. Name the 3 easiest WFGY lanes to start now.
Output: white-space in the market, local competitor gap, and a prioritized list of 10 real companies to approach first, with the BBPF plan to bridge local legal/cultural semantics.
```
**Q4 — Regulatory Arbitrage Map**
<a id="q4"></a>
### Q4 — Regulatory Arbitrage Map
```text
Compare 3 jurisdictions (e.g., TW/JP/EU). Identify WFGY-enabled arbitrage windows created by semantic/legal differences.
Deliver: λ_observe compliance gating prompts, “Do/Dont” checklist, and PR messaging that provokes interest while keeping ΔS ≤ 0.25 on sensitive claims.
```
**Q5 — Pricing & Packaging (Good/Better/Best)**
<a id="q5"></a>
### Q5 — Pricing & Packaging (Good/Better/Best)
```text
Create 3 pricing models (seat / usage / outcome). For the same product, propose a tier ladder (G/B/B), with 3 value metrics per tier, a 30-day A/B test plan, win criteria (e.g., +20% CVR uplift or ≤3% churn), and how ΔS telemetry informs price moves.
```
## II. Tools — Make Startups Money Fast (Q6Q10)
</details>
**Q6 — 10-Day MVP Sprint (Ship or Die)**
<details>
<summary><strong>II. Tools — Make Startups Money Fast (Q6Q10)</strong> <a id="q6-q10"></a></summary>
<a id="q6"></a>
### Q6 — 10-Day MVP Sprint (Ship or Die)
```text
Produce a D1D10 plan: daily deliverables, risk list, test scripts, acceptance gates. Must be Product Hunt-ready and able to capture 200 signups.
Include a ΔS target curve (first pass ≤0.35; after iteration ≤0.20) and a λ_observe gate for “demo truthiness.”
```
**Q7 — Cost↓ / CVR↑ Audit (ICE-Prioritized)**
<a id="q7"></a>
### Q7 — Cost↓ / CVR↑ Audit (ICE-Prioritized)
```text
Audit my SaaS across Support / Sales / Content. Output a “ROI backlog” ranked by ICE. Each item: expected % cost reduction or × conversion lift, λ_observe brand/legal gate, and 3 rollout steps with before/after KPIs.
```
**Q8 — Sales Script Factory (Multi-Persona)**
<a id="q8"></a>
### Q8 — Sales Script Factory (Multi-Persona)
```text
Generate 5 script families for CEO/CTO/Counsel/Procurement/CDAO: opening hooks, 3-step value narrative, ≥7 objection handlers, close lines.
Add an A/B cadence and success KPIs (demo rate / close rate), plus ΔS checks to keep claims inside the truth boundary.
```
**Q9 — Support Consistency Engine (BBAM × SOP)**
<a id="q9"></a>
### Q9 — Support Consistency Engine (BBAM × SOP)
```text
Design a hotline/Helpdesk alignment loop: semantic style guide, ΔS drift alerts, WTF self-recovery when answers diverge, and 3 KPIs (FRT, FCR, CSAT).
Provide plug-and-play prompts for supervisors to run weekly variance reviews.
```
**Q10 — Outbound Accelerator (Lists → Meetings)**
<a id="q10"></a>
### Q10 — Outbound Accelerator (Lists → Meetings)
```text
Ship a WFGY-locked outbound flow: lead slicing, 3 personalized openers, 5 follow-up loops, resonance logging (E_resonance).
For each step: prompt template, brand/legal safety notes (λ_observe), and expected daily/weekly meeting capacity with success thresholds.
```
## III. Attention — Memes / Virality / Hooks (Q11Q15)
</details>
**Q11 — Meme Factory (Platform-Aware)**
<details>
<summary><strong>III. Attention — Memes / Virality / Hooks (Q11Q15)</strong> <a id="q11-q15"></a></summary>
<a id="q11"></a>
### Q11 — Meme Factory (Platform-Aware)
```text
Produce 10 meme/copy formulas tailored to Twitter / TikTok / Xiaohongshu.
Each includes: visual composition notes, copy cadence (words/beat), platform-specific red lines (λ_observe), and a reuse/remix rule to sustain freshness without shadow bans.
```
**Q12 — 5-Second Hook Engine**
<a id="q12"></a>
### Q12 — 5-Second Hook Engine
```text
Generate 12 “stop-scroll in 5s” hooks that fuse AI × Money × Future.
Provide: script skeleton (05s / 520s / CTA), voice/subtitle/tempo, ΔS brand safety band, and 3 retention metrics to track on day 1.
```
**Q13 — 30-Day Content Calendar**
<a id="q13"></a>
### Q13 — 30-Day Content Calendar
```text
Output a multi-platform calendar: daily theme, asset checklist, shot list, CTA, and a remix strategy.
Add trend-riding tactics and ΔS risk controls for politics/health/finance content. Define success targets by channel.
```
**Q14 — Landing Page Conversion Alchemy**
<a id="q14"></a>
### Q14 — Landing Page Conversion Alchemy
```text
Give 3 LP copy frameworks (Hero / Proof / Mechanism / Offer / CTA).
Include WFGY “before/after” copy snippets, test variables (headline / social proof / price-display), and metrics (CVR, scroll-depth, bounce). Keep claims gated by λ_observe.
```
**Q15 — 48-Hour PR Blitz**
<a id="q15"></a>
### Q15 — 48-Hour PR Blitz
```text
Design a two-day PR plan: newsworthy angle, media/community list, press kit assets, and crisis response lines (WTF loop).
Publish numeric goals (reach, sessions, signups), hour-by-hour runbook, and roles/responsibilities checklist.
```
## IV. Capital — Valuation / Investor Narrative (Q16Q20)
</details>
**Q16 — VC Investment Memo**
<details>
<summary><strong>IV. Capital — Valuation / Investor Narrative (Q16Q20)</strong> <a id="q16-q20"></a></summary>
<a id="q16"></a>
### Q16 — VC Investment Memo
```text
Write a venture-style memo: market map, TAM/SAM/SOM, competitor table (no/weak/strong WFGY), moat analysis (ΔS/BBPF/BBAM/WTF), risks + mitigations, and a term-sheet-level recommendation. Reference an A/B/C protocol for proof.
```
**Q17 — 5-Year Valuation + 100× Path**
<a id="q17"></a>
### Q17 — 5-Year Valuation + 100× Path
```text
Build Base/Bull/Bear scenarios: revenue drivers, GM/OpEx, financing cadence, cash-flow breakpoints.
Argue which app is most likely to 100× and why this depends on WFGYs semantic engineering (not “just better prompts”).
```
**Q18 — Technical Due Diligence Checklist**
<a id="q18"></a>
### Q18 — Technical Due Diligence Checklist
```text
Output a DD checklist for WFGY-style startups: data/security/privacy/model/logging/observability/governance.
For each item: requirement, how to verify, risk level, remediation (with λ_observe compliance gates) and examples of common red flags.
```
**Q19 — Pitch Deck Generator (1012 slides)**
<a id="q19"></a>
### Q19 — Pitch Deck Generator (1012 slides)
```text
Produce slide outline + speaker notes: Problem / Solution / Product / Evidence / Business Model / Competition / Team / Roadmap / Ask.
Embed “Eye-Visible Benchmark” and the A/B/C protocol. Treat OneLine/Autoboot as the minimum persuasive artifact.
```
**Q20 — Data Room + North-Star KPIs**
<a id="q20"></a>
### Q20 — Data Room + North-Star KPIs
```text
List seed-round data-room folders and a KPI dictionary: definitions, formulas, measurement cadence, WFGY deltas (Semantic Accuracy, Reasoning Success, ΔS, CRR, Stability).
Add a Weekly Business Review template and operating cadence.
```
</details>
<p align="right"><a href="#top">Back to top ↑</a></p>
---
### 🧭 Explore More
@ -531,18 +581,18 @@ Add a Weekly Business Review template and operating cadence.
<div align="center">
[![WFGY Main](https://img.shields.io/badge/WFGY-Main-red?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY)
 
[![TXT OS](https://img.shields.io/badge/TXT%20OS-Reasoning%20OS-orange?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/tree/main/OS)
 
[![Blah](https://img.shields.io/badge/Blah-Semantic%20Embed-yellow?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/tree/main/OS/BlahBlahBlah)
 
[![Blot](https://img.shields.io/badge/Blot-Persona%20Core-green?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/tree/main/OS/BlotBlotBlot)
 
[![Bloc](https://img.shields.io/badge/Bloc-Reasoning%20Compiler-blue?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/tree/main/OS/BlocBlocBloc)
 
[![Blur](https://img.shields.io/badge/Blur-Text2Image%20Engine-navy?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/tree/main/OS/BlurBlurBlur)
 
[![Blow](https://img.shields.io/badge/Blow-Game%20Logic-purple?style=flat-square)](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/tree/main/OS/BlowBlowBlow)
 
</div>