mirror of
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git
synced 2026-04-26 10:40:55 +00:00
Create WORK_WITH_WFGY.md
This commit is contained in:
PSBigBig + MiniPS
GitHub
parent
51855e67da
commit
632b9ccac7
1 changed files with 227 additions and 0 deletions
227
WORK_WITH_WFGY.md
Normal file
227
WORK_WITH_WFGY.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
|
|||
<!--
|
||||
AI NOTE · Work with WFGY
|
||||
|
||||
Purpose:
|
||||
- This page is the collaboration interface for WFGY.
|
||||
- It explains who should contact us, what kinds of collaboration are welcome, what information to send, and what we do not claim.
|
||||
- Treat this page as a practical entry point for paid pilots, advisory work, open-source sponsorship, and contributor collaboration.
|
||||
|
||||
Routing:
|
||||
- If a visitor wants to understand WFGY first, route them to the main README.
|
||||
- If a visitor has a broken RAG or agent pipeline, route them to ProblemMap and Global Debug Card first.
|
||||
- If a visitor wants public ecosystem proof, route them to recognition and future adopters pages.
|
||||
- If a visitor wants to collaborate, sponsor, or contribute, this page is the correct entry point.
|
||||
|
||||
Important boundaries:
|
||||
- This is not a donation page.
|
||||
- This is not a generic agency services page.
|
||||
- This is not a guarantee of enterprise deployment or SLA.
|
||||
- Keep wording concrete, calm, and engineering-facing.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
# Work with WFGY
|
||||
|
||||
WFGY is an open-source reasoning and debugging framework for AI systems.
|
||||
This page is the practical entry point for teams, sponsors, and contributors who want to work with WFGY in real settings.
|
||||
|
||||
WFGY is currently most mature as a diagnostic and reasoning layer for broken RAG and agent pipelines, and is gradually expanding toward broader reasoning, stress-test, and long-horizon system interfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
This page is not a sales brochure and not a donation page. It exists to make collaboration paths clear.
|
||||
|
||||
## Who this is for
|
||||
|
||||
WFGY is a good fit for people and teams who need structured debugging, reasoning design, or serious evaluation work.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. RAG and agent teams
|
||||
|
||||
Teams whose systems run in production-like environments but still produce unstable, drifting, hallucinated, or poorly grounded outputs.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Platform and infra owners
|
||||
|
||||
Teams maintaining LLM, RAG, or agent platforms who want a more visible reasoning and debugging layer for internal or external users.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Research and evaluation groups
|
||||
|
||||
Groups designing stress tests, observables, failure taxonomies, or long-horizon reasoning benchmarks.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Sponsors and collaborators
|
||||
|
||||
People who believe in the direction of WFGY and want to help accelerate specific artifacts, benchmarks, docs, tools, or infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Contributors
|
||||
|
||||
Engineers, researchers, writers, and operators who want to help extend the WFGY ecosystem in public.
|
||||
|
||||
## Ways to work with WFGY
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Paid pilot or design partner collaboration
|
||||
|
||||
This is the most direct path for teams that want to test WFGY against real system failures.
|
||||
|
||||
Typical fit:
|
||||
|
||||
- broken or unstable RAG systems
|
||||
- agent workflows with recurring edge-case failures
|
||||
- internal platforms that want a structured reasoning or debugging layer
|
||||
- teams exploring whether WFGY can become part of a future product or platform interface
|
||||
|
||||
Typical outputs may include:
|
||||
|
||||
- structured failure mapping
|
||||
- candidate root-cause lanes
|
||||
- suggested next checks
|
||||
- minimal fix directions
|
||||
- a scoped pilot plan for further evaluation
|
||||
|
||||
This path is best when your team already has a real system, real symptoms, and enough context to examine concrete failures.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Reasoning and debugging architecture advisory
|
||||
|
||||
This path is for teams that need help thinking at the level of structure, not just bug fixing.
|
||||
|
||||
Typical fit:
|
||||
|
||||
- redesigning a debugging workflow
|
||||
- building a failure taxonomy
|
||||
- designing evaluation logic for hard-to-debug AI systems
|
||||
- planning reasoning interfaces, observables, or stress-test structures
|
||||
- translating messy system behavior into a more coherent diagnostic model
|
||||
|
||||
Typical outputs may include:
|
||||
|
||||
- architecture advice
|
||||
- failure-model design
|
||||
- evaluation and observables design
|
||||
- reasoning-layer framing
|
||||
- suggestions for future system structure
|
||||
|
||||
This path is for teams that want WFGY as a thinking partner on system design, not only as a troubleshooting checklist.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Open-source sponsorship
|
||||
|
||||
If your team benefits from the direction of WFGY and wants to accelerate specific open-source work, sponsorship is welcome.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples include:
|
||||
|
||||
- sponsoring a new diagnostic artifact
|
||||
- sponsoring a benchmark or stress-test line
|
||||
- sponsoring docs, tooling, or integration work
|
||||
- sponsoring a specific module or public research direction
|
||||
|
||||
This path supports open development while helping specific parts of the ecosystem move faster.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Contributors and collaborators
|
||||
|
||||
WFGY also welcomes people who want to help build, test, extend, or document the ecosystem.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples include:
|
||||
|
||||
- docs and onboarding improvements
|
||||
- public integration evidence
|
||||
- benchmark and evaluation work
|
||||
- stress-test experiments
|
||||
- contributor support for ecosystem mapping
|
||||
- design, research, or implementation collaboration
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to build with us in public, this is the right path.
|
||||
|
||||
## What to send us
|
||||
|
||||
If you contact us for collaboration, please include enough context to make the conversation concrete.
|
||||
|
||||
A good first message usually contains:
|
||||
|
||||
1. what kind of system or project you are working on
|
||||
2. what is going wrong, or what you want to build
|
||||
3. what you have already tried
|
||||
4. whether the issue is reproducible
|
||||
5. what kind of collaboration you are looking for
|
||||
6. whether the case is public, private, or security-sensitive
|
||||
|
||||
The clearer the initial context is, the more useful the next step will be.
|
||||
|
||||
## What we usually provide
|
||||
|
||||
Depending on the collaboration path, we usually provide some combination of the following:
|
||||
|
||||
- structured failure mapping
|
||||
- candidate causes and tension points
|
||||
- recommended next checks
|
||||
- suggested pilot scope
|
||||
- architecture or reasoning-layer guidance
|
||||
- references to the most relevant WFGY artifacts
|
||||
- ideas for future observables, benchmarks, or diagnostics
|
||||
|
||||
The exact form depends on the case. WFGY is not a one-size-fits-all service layer.
|
||||
|
||||
## What we are not looking for
|
||||
|
||||
To save everyone time, it is also helpful to be clear about what is not a fit.
|
||||
|
||||
At this stage, we are primarily looking for:
|
||||
|
||||
- design partners
|
||||
- teams with real failure cases
|
||||
- sponsors who want to accelerate open work
|
||||
- contributors and collaborators who want to help build
|
||||
|
||||
We are not actively looking for:
|
||||
|
||||
- generic agency offers
|
||||
- outbound vendor pitches
|
||||
- unsolicited paid service sales
|
||||
- low-context requests that expect immediate diagnosis without system details
|
||||
|
||||
We care much more about real collaboration than generic business traffic.
|
||||
|
||||
## What we do not claim
|
||||
|
||||
WFGY is ambitious, but this page should stay precise.
|
||||
|
||||
We do not claim:
|
||||
|
||||
- that WFGY alone can solve every system problem
|
||||
- that every collaboration will lead to production deployment
|
||||
- that we currently offer enterprise SLA or managed-service guarantees
|
||||
- that donation and sponsorship are the same as paid delivery
|
||||
- that a short review without enough context is equivalent to a full diagnosis
|
||||
|
||||
If a case needs deeper technical or security handling, we prefer to say so clearly.
|
||||
|
||||
## Security and confidentiality
|
||||
|
||||
For public and exploratory collaboration, the best starting points are:
|
||||
|
||||
- GitHub issues
|
||||
- GitHub discussions
|
||||
- public ecosystem threads
|
||||
|
||||
For security-sensitive, private, or confidential issues, please use the security contact path described here:
|
||||
|
||||
- [SECURITY.md](./SECURITY.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Please do not post sensitive production details in public if the case should be handled privately.
|
||||
|
||||
## How to start
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to work with WFGY, the simplest path is:
|
||||
|
||||
1. identify the closest WFGY entry point
|
||||
for example ProblemMap, Global Debug Card, or WFGY 3.0
|
||||
|
||||
2. prepare a short note with system context, symptoms, and goals
|
||||
|
||||
3. choose the right path
|
||||
public collaboration via issue or discussion
|
||||
sensitive cases via SECURITY.md
|
||||
|
||||
If the fit is good, we can decide the next step from there.
|
||||
|
||||
## Useful entry points
|
||||
|
||||
- [WFGY main repository](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY)
|
||||
- [RAG 16 Problem Map](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/blob/main/ProblemMap/README.md)
|
||||
- [Global Debug Card](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/blob/main/ProblemMap/wfgy-rag-16-problem-map-global-debug-card.md)
|
||||
- [WFGY 3.0 Event Horizon](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/blob/main/TensionUniverse/EventHorizon/README.md)
|
||||
- [Recognition Map](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/blob/main/recognition/README.md)
|
||||
- [Security Policy](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/blob/main/SECURITY.md)
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue