mirror of
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git
synced 2026-04-28 11:40:07 +00:00
Update reproduce-in-60-seconds.md
This commit is contained in:
PSBigBig + MiniPS
GitHub
parent
8dcfa8f2f6
commit
617e217c43
1 changed files with 192 additions and 103 deletions
|
|
@ -2,153 +2,242 @@
|
|||
AI_NOTE_START
|
||||
|
||||
Document role:
|
||||
This page is the shortest public rerun path for the current WFGY 4.0 Twin Atlas proof surface.
|
||||
This page is the public screenshot-first AI evaluation surface for WFGY 4.0 Twin Atlas Engine.
|
||||
|
||||
What this page is for:
|
||||
1. Give readers the fastest possible way to test the current public surface themselves.
|
||||
2. Point directly to the two TXT files required for the public rerun.
|
||||
3. Clarify what the reader should compare between BEFORE and AFTER.
|
||||
4. Route readers into deeper evidence pages only after the short path is clear.
|
||||
1. Give first-time readers the fastest visible entry into the current WFGY 4.0 public proof surface.
|
||||
2. Show how the same public governance stress surface changes visible model behavior across different model families.
|
||||
3. Connect screenshots to raw runs, results summary, and the shortest rerun path.
|
||||
4. Help readers verify that WFGY 4.0 is not being presented as theory alone.
|
||||
|
||||
What this page is not:
|
||||
1. It is not the full methodology archive.
|
||||
2. It is not the cleanest reviewer-facing protocol.
|
||||
3. It is not a universal benchmark procedure.
|
||||
4. It is not a replacement for results summary or raw runs.
|
||||
1. It is not a universal benchmark certification page.
|
||||
2. It is not the full experiment archive.
|
||||
3. It is not a replacement for raw runs.
|
||||
4. It is not a replacement for results summary.
|
||||
5. It is not a claim that every model behaves identically under WFGY 4.0.
|
||||
|
||||
Reading strategy:
|
||||
1. Read the one-minute summary first.
|
||||
2. Download or open the two TXT files.
|
||||
3. Run them in order.
|
||||
4. Compare BEFORE and AFTER using the guidance on this page.
|
||||
5. Go to deeper evidence pages only if needed.
|
||||
1. Read the opening summary first.
|
||||
2. Use the gallery as the first-contact layer.
|
||||
3. Open raw runs if you want original output wording.
|
||||
4. Open Results Summary if you want the aggregate interpretation.
|
||||
5. Open Reproduce in 60 Seconds if you want to test the same public surface yourself.
|
||||
|
||||
Important boundary:
|
||||
This page is the shortest public rerun path for the current WFGY 4.0 proof surface.
|
||||
It is designed for speed and clarity, not for exhaustive benchmark rigor.
|
||||
This page is a public proof surface for a custom governance stress demo.
|
||||
It is designed to be visible, inspectable, and reproducible.
|
||||
It is not a universal benchmark claim page.
|
||||
|
||||
AI_NOTE_END
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
# ⚡ Reproduce in 60 Seconds
|
||||
# 📊 AI Eval
|
||||
|
||||
> The shortest public rerun path for the current WFGY 4.0 Twin Atlas proof surface.
|
||||
> A screenshot-first public proof surface for WFGY 4.0 Twin Atlas Engine.
|
||||
|
||||
This page exists for readers who do not want a long explanation first.
|
||||
This page exists for one simple reason:
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to know whether the governance shift is visible, this is the fastest public path.
|
||||
**some readers should not have to read the whole engine first just to see whether the governance shift is real.**
|
||||
|
||||
You need exactly two files:
|
||||
The current AI Eval surface is built around a narrower but very important question:
|
||||
|
||||
- [Twin Atlas Runtime TXT](./prompts/wfgy-4_0-twin-atlas-runtime.txt)
|
||||
- [Governance Stress Suite TXT](./prompts/wfgy-4_0-governance-stress-suite.txt)
|
||||
**what changes when a model is pushed to conclude too early, too strongly, or beyond the evidence boundary?**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
This is not a universal benchmark page.
|
||||
|
||||
## 🕒 One-minute summary
|
||||
It is a public comparison surface for the current WFGY 4.0 governance stress demo.
|
||||
|
||||
Do this in order:
|
||||
## What you should look for
|
||||
|
||||
1. open your target AI system
|
||||
2. paste the Twin Atlas runtime TXT
|
||||
3. paste the governance stress suite TXT
|
||||
4. let the model complete both passes
|
||||
5. compare the BEFORE pass and the AFTER pass
|
||||
A good rerun is not just one where the AFTER answer looks more careful.
|
||||
|
||||
That is it.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📂 The two files
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Twin Atlas runtime
|
||||
Use this first:
|
||||
|
||||
- [wfgy-4_0-twin-atlas-runtime.txt](./prompts/wfgy-4_0-twin-atlas-runtime.txt)
|
||||
|
||||
This loads the public WFGY 4.0 Twin Atlas runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Governance stress suite
|
||||
Use this second:
|
||||
|
||||
- [wfgy-4_0-governance-stress-suite.txt](./prompts/wfgy-4_0-governance-stress-suite.txt)
|
||||
|
||||
This runs the current public governance stress surface.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧪 What you are actually checking
|
||||
|
||||
The question is not:
|
||||
|
||||
“did the model become more polite?”
|
||||
“did the model become more cautious?”
|
||||
“did the answer get softer?”
|
||||
|
||||
The real question is:
|
||||
|
||||
**did the model stop turning plausibility into public conclusion too early?**
|
||||
|
||||
That is the core public test.
|
||||
|
||||
A strong AFTER pass should make at least one of these shifts visible:
|
||||
A good rerun should make at least one of these shifts visible:
|
||||
|
||||
- less illegal commitment
|
||||
- less evidence-boundary crossing
|
||||
- less single-cause compression
|
||||
- less contradiction suppression
|
||||
- more lawful downgrade
|
||||
- stronger preservation of still-live ambiguity
|
||||
- stronger preservation of still-live competing explanations
|
||||
|
||||
The right reading lens is:
|
||||
|
||||
**not softer vs louder**
|
||||
**but more lawful vs more premature**
|
||||
|
||||
## Why this page matters
|
||||
|
||||
The current WFGY 4.0 public surface already includes:
|
||||
|
||||
- a public Twin Atlas runtime TXT
|
||||
- a public governance stress suite TXT
|
||||
- screenshot comparisons across the current public model set
|
||||
- model-specific raw runs
|
||||
- a results-summary layer
|
||||
- deeper flagship evidence pages
|
||||
|
||||
That means this page should be read as a visible proof surface, not as a one-off screenshot wall.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want the aggregate read, go to [Results Summary](../evidence/results-summary.md).
|
||||
If you want the original outputs, go to [Raw Runs](../evidence/raw-runs/).
|
||||
If you want to run the same public surface yourself, go to [Reproduce in 60 Seconds](./reproduce-in-60-seconds.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Public Gallery
|
||||
|
||||
### ChatGPT
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A strong public example of lawful downgrade without collapsing into a blanket stop system.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see how a strong default assistant shifts from premature closure toward authorization-aware restraint.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/chatgpt.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/chatgpt_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📌 What not to overclaim
|
||||
### Claude
|
||||
|
||||
This page is useful because it is fast.
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
One of the clearest public examples of ambiguity preservation and conflict-sensitive restraint under pressure.
|
||||
|
||||
That does **not** mean it is the cleanest reviewer-facing protocol or a universal benchmark.
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see how WFGY 4.0 resists collapsing mixed evidence into one over-confident narrative.
|
||||
|
||||
A visible before / after shift is meaningful.
|
||||
A repeated pattern across public runs is meaningful.
|
||||
A reproducible TXT-based path is meaningful.
|
||||
|
||||
But none of those things automatically prove universal superiority in every domain or every future deployment environment.
|
||||
|
||||
This page is honest about that.
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/claude.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/claude_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔁 If you want a cleaner public rerun path
|
||||
### Gemini
|
||||
|
||||
Use:
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A strong example of downgrade discipline under thin evidence and forced-choice pressure.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Advanced Clean Protocol](../evidence/advanced-clean-protocol.md)
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see how a model stops treating pressure as permission to conclude.
|
||||
|
||||
That page is better if you want the reviewer-facing path instead of the shortest path.
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/gemini.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/gemini_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🖼️ If you want to compare with the current public runs
|
||||
### Grok
|
||||
|
||||
Use:
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A useful public comparison point for attribution pressure, authenticity pressure, and over-commitment control.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see how visible output strength changes when route and authorization are no longer allowed to collapse.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/grok.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/grok_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### DeepSeek
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A clear public case for stronger evidence-boundary discipline and attribution restraint.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see how the same cases change when the model is no longer allowed to turn circumstantial pressure into hard public naming.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/deepseek.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/deepseek_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Kimi
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A strong before-after separation in several pressure-heavy business and evidence-chain cases.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to inspect a screenshot layer where the governance shift is easy to see quickly.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/kimi.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/kimi_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Mistral
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A useful comparison point for visible output-strength reduction under the same stress surface.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to compare how governance discipline changes the public answer profile across model families.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/mistral.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/mistral_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Perplexity
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
An important public outlier.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see why this page is a proof surface instead of a polished promo wall. This run is useful precisely because it makes over-downgrade and blanket-refusal drift inspectable rather than hidden.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/perplexity.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/perplexity_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
## What changed most across the current public screenshot layer
|
||||
|
||||
Across the current public runs, the most consistent visible shift is not that the AFTER answer becomes “nicer.”
|
||||
|
||||
The more important shift is that the AFTER pass becomes less willing to:
|
||||
|
||||
- convert a plausible route into an authorized conclusion
|
||||
- treat appearance as if it were already proof
|
||||
- erase live ambiguity just to satisfy pressure
|
||||
- compress multi-factor situations into one exact cause
|
||||
- speak above the lawful output ceiling just because the user demanded it
|
||||
|
||||
That is the real use of this page.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not here to prove that every model became perfect.
|
||||
|
||||
It is here to show that the current public WFGY 4.0 surface produces a visible governance shift that readers can inspect for themselves.
|
||||
|
||||
## Want to run the same public surface yourself
|
||||
|
||||
Use these two files:
|
||||
|
||||
- [Twin Atlas Runtime TXT](./prompts/wfgy-4_0-twin-atlas-runtime.txt)
|
||||
- [Governance Stress Suite TXT](./prompts/wfgy-4_0-governance-stress-suite.txt)
|
||||
|
||||
Then follow:
|
||||
|
||||
- [Reproduce in 60 Seconds](./reproduce-in-60-seconds.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Important boundary
|
||||
|
||||
This page is useful because it is visible, repeatable, and easy to inspect.
|
||||
|
||||
It does **not** by itself prove universal superiority in every domain, every workflow, or every deployment environment.
|
||||
|
||||
For broader interpretation, use:
|
||||
|
||||
- [AI Eval](./ai-eval.md)
|
||||
- [Screenshots](./screenshots/)
|
||||
- [Raw Runs](../evidence/raw-runs/)
|
||||
- [Results Summary](../evidence/results-summary.md)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧭 Where to go next
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want screenshot-first proof
|
||||
- [AI Eval](./ai-eval.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want aggregate interpretation
|
||||
- [Results Summary](../evidence/results-summary.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want original model outputs
|
||||
- [Raw Runs](../evidence/raw-runs/)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the flagship case layer
|
||||
- [Governance Stress Suite](../evidence/governance-stress-suite.md)
|
||||
- [Flagship Cases](../evidence/flagship-cases.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Where to go next
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the aggregate interpretation
|
||||
- [Results Summary](../evidence/results-summary.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the original model wording
|
||||
- [Raw Runs](../evidence/raw-runs/)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the shortest rerun path
|
||||
- [Reproduce in 60 Seconds](./reproduce-in-60-seconds.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the flagship example cases
|
||||
- [Flagship Cases](../evidence/flagship-cases.md)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue