mirror of
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git
synced 2026-04-28 03:29:51 +00:00
Update README.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
40457f9080
commit
47bb03f3b2
1 changed files with 14 additions and 4 deletions
18
README.md
18
README.md
|
|
@ -1190,11 +1190,21 @@ A `.txt`-based semantic operating system. Injects directly into any LLM's memory
|
|||
### reasoning
|
||||
WFGY introduces a ΔS-based multi-perspective reasoning engine. Unlike traditional symbolic logic, it simulates observer shifts and semantic force-fields to derive meaning.
|
||||
|
||||
### semantic-tension *(coming soon)*
|
||||
Placeholder. Based on the ΔS formula from WFGY’s mathematical model. Explains tension between input expectation and perceived resonance.
|
||||
### semantic-tension
|
||||
A core variable in the WFGY engine, ΔS (semantic tension) quantifies the "pull" between a user’s prompt and the model’s internal semantic field.
|
||||
High ΔS implies misalignment or conceptual stretch; low ΔS means semantic stability.
|
||||
This allows models to detect vague, contradictory, or overly compressed queries — and respond accordingly with disambiguation or reflection.
|
||||
|
||||
### language-alignment *(coming soon)*
|
||||
Placeholder. Focuses on how WFGY redefines alignment not as static obedience, but dynamic semantic coherence.
|
||||
Used across all WFGY Family tools to guide hallucination control, multiview logic, and prompt reformulation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### language-alignment
|
||||
Traditional alignment asks: *“Did the model follow instructions?”*
|
||||
WFGY reframes this as: *“Did the output resonate semantically with the prompt’s intent, tone, and logic?”*
|
||||
This dynamic alignment checks internal coherence (ΔS), observer compatibility (λ_observe), and resonance energy (E_resonance).
|
||||
|
||||
It treats alignment as a living semantic contract — not just accuracy, but meaning integrity.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue