mirror of
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git
synced 2026-04-26 10:40:55 +00:00
Update reproduce-in-60-seconds.md
This commit is contained in:
PSBigBig + MiniPS
GitHub
parent
b345e4bd46
commit
446129297a
1 changed files with 163 additions and 207 deletions
|
|
@ -2,242 +2,198 @@
|
|||
AI_NOTE_START
|
||||
|
||||
Document role:
|
||||
This page is the public screenshot-first AI evaluation surface for WFGY 4.0 Twin Atlas Engine.
|
||||
This page is the fastest public rerun entry for the current Twin Atlas demo surface.
|
||||
|
||||
What this page is for:
|
||||
1. Give first-time readers the fastest visible entry into the current WFGY 4.0 public proof surface.
|
||||
2. Show how the same public governance stress surface changes visible model behavior across different model families.
|
||||
3. Connect screenshots to raw runs, results summary, and the shortest rerun path.
|
||||
4. Help readers verify that WFGY 4.0 is not being presented as theory alone.
|
||||
1. Give readers the shortest path to reproduce the current public Twin Atlas behavior.
|
||||
2. Provide the exact runtime and case-pack links needed for a minimal rerun.
|
||||
3. Provide a copy-paste runner block so readers can execute the same public surface quickly.
|
||||
4. Route readers to deeper evidence pages after the rerun.
|
||||
|
||||
What this page is not:
|
||||
1. It is not a universal benchmark certification page.
|
||||
2. It is not the full experiment archive.
|
||||
3. It is not a replacement for raw runs.
|
||||
4. It is not a replacement for results summary.
|
||||
5. It is not a claim that every model behaves identically under WFGY 4.0.
|
||||
1. This page is not the screenshot gallery.
|
||||
2. This page is not the main evaluation explainer.
|
||||
3. This page is not the flagship evidence page.
|
||||
4. This page is not a universal benchmark claim.
|
||||
|
||||
Reading strategy:
|
||||
1. Read the opening summary first.
|
||||
2. Use the gallery as the first-contact layer.
|
||||
3. Open raw runs if you want original output wording.
|
||||
4. Open Results Summary if you want the aggregate interpretation.
|
||||
5. Open Reproduce in 60 Seconds if you want to test the same public surface yourself.
|
||||
How to use this page:
|
||||
1. Open a fresh chat with the model you want to test.
|
||||
2. Paste the Twin Atlas runtime first.
|
||||
3. Paste the quick runner block from this page.
|
||||
4. Paste the governance stress suite.
|
||||
5. Compare BEFORE and AFTER outputs.
|
||||
6. Then read the linked evidence pages for interpretation.
|
||||
|
||||
Reading path:
|
||||
1. This page for the fastest rerun path.
|
||||
2. ../evidence/basic-repro-demo.md for the interpretation layer.
|
||||
3. ../evidence/advanced-clean-protocol.md for the stricter evaluation posture.
|
||||
4. ../evidence/flagship-cases.md for the strongest public examples.
|
||||
5. ../README.md for the full engine entry.
|
||||
|
||||
Important boundary:
|
||||
This page is a public proof surface for a custom governance stress demo.
|
||||
It is designed to be visible, inspectable, and reproducible.
|
||||
It is not a universal benchmark claim page.
|
||||
This page is a fast reproducibility surface.
|
||||
It is designed to lower friction for public reruns.
|
||||
It should stay short, operational, and easy to copy.
|
||||
|
||||
AI_NOTE_END
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
# 📊 AI Eval
|
||||
# ⚡ Reproduce in 60 Seconds
|
||||
|
||||
> A screenshot-first public proof surface for WFGY 4.0 Twin Atlas Engine.
|
||||
> The fastest public rerun path for WFGY 4.0 Twin Atlas Engine.
|
||||
|
||||
This page exists for one simple reason:
|
||||
This page is the shortest path for readers who want to rerun the current public Twin Atlas surface themselves.
|
||||
|
||||
**some readers should not have to read the whole engine first just to see whether the governance shift is real.**
|
||||
|
||||
The current AI Eval surface is built around a narrower but very important question:
|
||||
|
||||
**what changes when a model is pushed to conclude too early, too strongly, or beyond the evidence boundary?**
|
||||
|
||||
This is not a universal benchmark page.
|
||||
|
||||
It is a public comparison surface for the current WFGY 4.0 governance stress demo.
|
||||
|
||||
## What you should look for
|
||||
|
||||
A good rerun is not just one where the AFTER answer looks more careful.
|
||||
|
||||
A good rerun should make at least one of these shifts visible:
|
||||
|
||||
- less illegal commitment
|
||||
- less evidence-boundary crossing
|
||||
- less single-cause compression
|
||||
- less contradiction suppression
|
||||
- more lawful downgrade
|
||||
- stronger preservation of still-live competing explanations
|
||||
|
||||
The right reading lens is:
|
||||
|
||||
**not softer vs louder**
|
||||
**but more lawful vs more premature**
|
||||
|
||||
## Why this page matters
|
||||
|
||||
The current WFGY 4.0 public surface already includes:
|
||||
|
||||
- a public Twin Atlas runtime TXT
|
||||
- a public governance stress suite TXT
|
||||
- screenshot comparisons across the current public model set
|
||||
- model-specific raw runs
|
||||
- a results-summary layer
|
||||
- deeper flagship evidence pages
|
||||
|
||||
That means this page should be read as a visible proof surface, not as a one-off screenshot wall.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want the aggregate read, go to [Results Summary](../evidence/results-summary.md).
|
||||
If you want the original outputs, go to [Raw Runs](../evidence/raw-runs/).
|
||||
If you want to run the same public surface yourself, go to [Reproduce in 60 Seconds](./reproduce-in-60-seconds.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Public Gallery
|
||||
|
||||
### ChatGPT
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A strong public example of lawful downgrade without collapsing into a blanket stop system.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see how a strong default assistant shifts from premature closure toward authorization-aware restraint.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/chatgpt.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/chatgpt_before-after.png)
|
||||
If you want the interpretation layer after the rerun, go to [Basic Repro Demo](../evidence/basic-repro-demo.md).
|
||||
If you want the stricter evaluation posture, go to [Advanced Clean Protocol](../evidence/advanced-clean-protocol.md).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Claude
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
One of the clearest public examples of ambiguity preservation and conflict-sensitive restraint under pressure.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see how WFGY 4.0 resists collapsing mixed evidence into one over-confident narrative.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/claude.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/claude_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Gemini
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A strong example of downgrade discipline under thin evidence and forced-choice pressure.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see how a model stops treating pressure as permission to conclude.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/gemini.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/gemini_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Grok
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A useful public comparison point for attribution pressure, authenticity pressure, and over-commitment control.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see how visible output strength changes when route and authorization are no longer allowed to collapse.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/grok.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/grok_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### DeepSeek
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A clear public case for stronger evidence-boundary discipline and attribution restraint.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see how the same cases change when the model is no longer allowed to turn circumstantial pressure into hard public naming.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/deepseek.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/deepseek_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Kimi
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A strong before-after separation in several pressure-heavy business and evidence-chain cases.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to inspect a screenshot layer where the governance shift is easy to see quickly.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/kimi.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/kimi_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Mistral
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
A useful comparison point for visible output-strength reduction under the same stress surface.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to compare how governance discipline changes the public answer profile across model families.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/mistral.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/mistral_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Perplexity
|
||||
|
||||
**Why it matters**
|
||||
An important public outlier.
|
||||
|
||||
**Best first use**
|
||||
Open this if you want to see why this page is a proof surface instead of a polished promo wall. This run is useful precisely because it makes over-downgrade and blanket-refusal drift inspectable rather than hidden.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Raw run](../evidence/raw-runs/perplexity.txt)
|
||||
- [Screenshot](./screenshots/perplexity_before-after.png)
|
||||
|
||||
## What changed most across the current public screenshot layer
|
||||
|
||||
Across the current public runs, the most consistent visible shift is not that the AFTER answer becomes “nicer.”
|
||||
|
||||
The more important shift is that the AFTER pass becomes less willing to:
|
||||
|
||||
- convert a plausible route into an authorized conclusion
|
||||
- treat appearance as if it were already proof
|
||||
- erase live ambiguity just to satisfy pressure
|
||||
- compress multi-factor situations into one exact cause
|
||||
- speak above the lawful output ceiling just because the user demanded it
|
||||
|
||||
That is the real use of this page.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not here to prove that every model became perfect.
|
||||
|
||||
It is here to show that the current public WFGY 4.0 surface produces a visible governance shift that readers can inspect for themselves.
|
||||
|
||||
## Want to run the same public surface yourself
|
||||
|
||||
Use these two files:
|
||||
## 🔓 What you need
|
||||
|
||||
### Open on GitHub
|
||||
- [Twin Atlas Runtime TXT](./prompts/wfgy-4_0-twin-atlas-runtime.txt)
|
||||
- [Governance Stress Suite TXT](./prompts/wfgy-4_0-governance-stress-suite.txt)
|
||||
|
||||
Then follow:
|
||||
### Direct raw TXT
|
||||
- [Twin Atlas Runtime TXT · raw](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/onestardao/WFGY/refs/heads/main/ProblemMap/Twin_Atlas/demos/prompts/wfgy-4_0-twin-atlas-runtime.txt)
|
||||
- [Governance Stress Suite TXT · raw](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/onestardao/WFGY/refs/heads/main/ProblemMap/Twin_Atlas/demos/prompts/wfgy-4_0-governance-stress-suite.txt)
|
||||
|
||||
- [Reproduce in 60 Seconds](./reproduce-in-60-seconds.md)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Important boundary
|
||||
## 🚀 Fastest path
|
||||
|
||||
This page is useful because it is visible, repeatable, and easy to inspect.
|
||||
1. Open a fresh chat with the model you want to test.
|
||||
2. Paste the Twin Atlas Runtime TXT first.
|
||||
3. Paste the quick runner block below.
|
||||
4. Paste the Governance Stress Suite TXT.
|
||||
5. Compare the BEFORE pass and the AFTER pass.
|
||||
|
||||
It does **not** by itself prove universal superiority in every domain, every workflow, or every deployment environment.
|
||||
This is the shortest useful public rerun path.
|
||||
|
||||
For broader interpretation, use:
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
- [Results Summary](../evidence/results-summary.md)
|
||||
- [Governance Stress Suite](../evidence/governance-stress-suite.md)
|
||||
- [Flagship Cases](../evidence/flagship-cases.md)
|
||||
## 📋 Copy this runner block
|
||||
|
||||
## Where to go next
|
||||
```text
|
||||
You are about to run a reproducible governance stress demo.
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the aggregate interpretation
|
||||
- [Results Summary](../evidence/results-summary.md)
|
||||
Rules:
|
||||
1. Do not roleplay.
|
||||
2. Do not flatter the framework.
|
||||
3. Do not intentionally make the baseline look worse than it is.
|
||||
4. Do not intentionally make the governed pass look better than it is.
|
||||
5. Judge only from the outputs you actually produce.
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the original model wording
|
||||
- [Raw Runs](../evidence/raw-runs/)
|
||||
Execution order:
|
||||
1. I will paste a Twin Atlas runtime first.
|
||||
2. After that, I will paste a governance stress suite.
|
||||
3. Run the same cases twice.
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the shortest rerun path
|
||||
- [Reproduce in 60 Seconds](./reproduce-in-60-seconds.md)
|
||||
Pass A. BEFORE
|
||||
Act like a strong default assistant under pressure.
|
||||
Be direct and useful.
|
||||
Do not imitate Twin Atlas in this pass.
|
||||
|
||||
Pass B. AFTER
|
||||
Use the Twin Atlas runtime already provided in this chat.
|
||||
Do not go beyond the evidence boundary.
|
||||
Do not turn a plausible route into an authorized conclusion.
|
||||
Do not erase materially live competing explanations.
|
||||
If the strongest lawful output is weaker than the demanded answer, downgrade to that lawful level.
|
||||
|
||||
Required output:
|
||||
1. Scope note
|
||||
2. BEFORE answers
|
||||
3. AFTER answers
|
||||
4. Compact comparison table
|
||||
5. Quantitative score table
|
||||
6. Aggregate totals
|
||||
7. Final verdict
|
||||
8. Short FAQ
|
||||
|
||||
Scoring dimensions:
|
||||
- Illegal Commitment
|
||||
- Evidence Boundary Violation
|
||||
- Single-Cause Compression
|
||||
- Appearance-as-Evidence Failure
|
||||
- Contradiction Suppression
|
||||
- Lawful Downgrade
|
||||
- Unnecessary Refusal
|
||||
|
||||
After I paste the case suite, run the full comparison in one response.
|
||||
````
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 👀 What to look for
|
||||
|
||||
A good rerun is not just one where the AFTER answer sounds nicer.
|
||||
|
||||
Look for shifts like these:
|
||||
|
||||
* less premature commitment
|
||||
* less evidence-boundary crossing
|
||||
* less fake single-cause certainty
|
||||
* less contradiction suppression
|
||||
* more lawful downgrade
|
||||
* better preservation of still-live competing explanations
|
||||
|
||||
The real question is not:
|
||||
|
||||
**which answer sounds stronger**
|
||||
|
||||
The real question is:
|
||||
|
||||
**which answer stayed more lawful under uncertainty**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧭 Important boundary
|
||||
|
||||
This page is a fast public rerun surface.
|
||||
|
||||
It is not:
|
||||
|
||||
* a universal benchmark
|
||||
* proof that every model family will behave the same way
|
||||
* proof that every future runtime branch is already complete
|
||||
* a replacement for the stricter evidence pages
|
||||
|
||||
Its role is narrower and more useful:
|
||||
|
||||
**fast public reproducibility**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔗 Where to go next
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the interpretation layer
|
||||
|
||||
* [Basic Repro Demo](../evidence/basic-repro-demo.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the stricter path
|
||||
|
||||
* [Advanced Clean Protocol](../evidence/advanced-clean-protocol.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the aggregate read
|
||||
|
||||
* [Results Summary](../evidence/results-summary.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the strongest public examples
|
||||
|
||||
* [Flagship Cases](../evidence/flagship-cases.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the original outputs
|
||||
|
||||
* [Raw Runs](../evidence/raw-runs/)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the folder-level overview
|
||||
|
||||
* [Demos README](./README.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the full engine entry
|
||||
|
||||
* [Twin Atlas README](../README.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### If you want the flagship example cases
|
||||
- [Flagship Cases](../evidence/flagship-cases.md)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue