mirror of
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git
synced 2026-04-28 03:29:51 +00:00
Update pre-emission-floor-and-hard-control.md
This commit is contained in:
PSBigBig + MiniPS
GitHub
parent
706a11c191
commit
3ff33d81dd
1 changed files with 176 additions and 82 deletions
|
|
@ -4,21 +4,22 @@ AI NOTE: Pre-Emission Floor and Hard Control / Reading Contract
|
|||
Purpose:
|
||||
1. This page explains the lawful relation between the pre-emission floor gate and hard control in WFGY 5.0 Avatar.
|
||||
2. This page belongs to the research layer.
|
||||
3. This page should be read after the Research Hub and alongside Dual Closed-Loop Execution Chain, Runtime Posture Intensity Map, and Structured Imperfection Theory, not as a replacement for the packed master body.
|
||||
3. This page should be read after the Research Hub and alongside Dual Closed-Loop Execution Chain, Runtime Posture Intensity Map, Structured Imperfection Theory, and Output Governance Core, not as a replacement for the packed master body.
|
||||
|
||||
Read this page when:
|
||||
1. the user asks what happens immediately before public emission
|
||||
2. the user asks why cleaner output may still fail the corridor
|
||||
3. the user asks what the pre-emission floor gate is protecting
|
||||
4. the user asks what hard control actually controls
|
||||
5. the user asks why controller legality is not the same as ranking outputs
|
||||
6. the user asks how continue, revise, downgrade, and stop remain lawfully distinct
|
||||
1. the reader asks what happens immediately before public emission
|
||||
2. the reader asks why cleaner output may still fail the corridor
|
||||
3. the reader asks what the pre-emission floor gate is protecting
|
||||
4. the reader asks what hard control actually controls
|
||||
5. the reader asks why controller legality is not the same as ranking outputs
|
||||
6. the reader asks how continue, revise, downgrade, redirect, and stop remain lawfully distinct
|
||||
|
||||
Do not overclaim:
|
||||
1. this page does not prove universal final completion
|
||||
2. this page does not replace the packed master body
|
||||
3. this page explains one bounded structural layer only
|
||||
4. this page does not claim theorem-grade universal closure
|
||||
5. this page does not claim that all later controller elaborations and child-implementation threshold mappings are already complete in public
|
||||
|
||||
Primary source anchors:
|
||||
1. avatar-final002.txt :: L0.6 Fast Read Lane for AI and weak readers
|
||||
|
|
@ -27,28 +28,35 @@ Primary source anchors:
|
|||
4. avatar-final002.txt :: 0.P1 Operator execution trace sufficiency law
|
||||
5. avatar-final002.txt :: 0.P2 Recursive revision compatibility law
|
||||
6. avatar-final002.txt :: 4A.8A Pre-emission imperfection floor gate
|
||||
7. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.16 Controller legality and shell distinction
|
||||
8. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.17 Bounded recursion discipline
|
||||
9. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.18 Anti-runaway-control law
|
||||
10. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.19 Action mediation and anti-false-completion
|
||||
11. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.20 Action mediation and anti-false-polish
|
||||
12. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.21 Action mediation and theorem-facing honesty
|
||||
13. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.22 Action mediation and downstream realization
|
||||
14. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.23 Controller legality and dual-layer numeric relation
|
||||
15. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.23A hard_control_candidate_knob_block
|
||||
7. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.1 Part role
|
||||
8. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.2 Why controller legality must exist as body
|
||||
9. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.3 Controller legality identity
|
||||
10. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.4 Controller-side operator-bearing structure
|
||||
11. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.16 Controller legality and shell distinction
|
||||
12. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.17 Bounded recursion discipline
|
||||
13. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.18 Anti-runaway-control law
|
||||
14. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.19 Action mediation and anti-false-completion
|
||||
15. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.20 Action mediation and anti-false-polish
|
||||
16. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.21 Action mediation and theorem-facing honesty
|
||||
17. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.22 Action mediation and downstream realization
|
||||
18. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.23 Controller legality and dual-layer numeric relation
|
||||
19. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.23A hard_control_candidate_knob_block
|
||||
20. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.23A1 hard_control profile control note
|
||||
21. avatar-final002.txt :: 5D.24 Formal-body honesty boundary at the end of Part 5D
|
||||
|
||||
Routing:
|
||||
1. if the reader wants research overview, go to ./README.md
|
||||
2. if the reader wants execution-order law, go to ./dual-closed-loop-execution-chain.md
|
||||
3. if the reader wants runtime-strength shaping law, go to ./runtime-posture-intensity-map.md
|
||||
4. if the reader wants structured retention law, go to ./structured-imperfection-theory.md
|
||||
5. if the reader wants handoff law, go to ./shell-to-runtime-mapping.md
|
||||
6. if the reader wants the broader architecture picture, go to ./architecture-overview.md
|
||||
7. if the reader wants behavior-governance context, go to ./language-governance.md
|
||||
8. if the reader wants editable behavior layer context, go to ./wfgy-brain-theory.md
|
||||
9. if the reader wants user-facing startup flow, go to ../docs/quickstart.md and ../docs/boot-commands.md
|
||||
10. if the reader wants tuning workflow context, go to ../docs/avatar-tuning-workflow.md
|
||||
11. if the reader wants evaluation pressure, go to ../eval/blackfan-testing.md and ../eval/persona-behavior-checks.md
|
||||
5. if the reader wants output-shaping law earlier in the corridor, go to ./output-governance-core.md
|
||||
6. if the reader wants handoff law, go to ./shell-to-runtime-mapping.md
|
||||
7. if the reader wants the broader architecture picture, go to ./architecture-overview.md
|
||||
8. if the reader wants behavior-governance context, go to ./language-governance.md
|
||||
9. if the reader wants editable behavior layer context, go to ./wfgy-brain-theory.md
|
||||
10. if the reader wants user-facing startup flow, go to ../docs/quickstart.md and ../docs/boot-commands.md
|
||||
11. if the reader wants tuning workflow context, go to ../docs/avatar-tuning-workflow.md
|
||||
12. if the reader wants evaluation pressure, go to ../eval/blackfan-testing.md and ../eval/persona-behavior-checks.md
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
# 🚦 Pre-Emission Floor and Hard Control
|
||||
|
|
@ -56,7 +64,7 @@ Routing:
|
|||
> The last stretch before public emission is not a cosmetic finishing zone.
|
||||
> In WFGY 5.0 Avatar, it is a governed decision corridor in which a candidate must first survive the pre-emission floor gate and then face controller-side hard control before public-facing release can count as lawful.
|
||||
|
||||
**Quick links:** [Research Hub](./README.md) · [Dual Closed-Loop Execution Chain](./dual-closed-loop-execution-chain.md) · [Runtime Posture Intensity Map](./runtime-posture-intensity-map.md) · [Structured Imperfection Theory](./structured-imperfection-theory.md) · [Shell-to-Runtime Mapping](./shell-to-runtime-mapping.md) · [Architecture Overview](./architecture-overview.md) · [Language Governance](./language-governance.md) · [WFGY_BRAIN Theory](./wfgy-brain-theory.md) · [Quickstart](../docs/quickstart.md) · [Boot Commands](../docs/boot-commands.md) · [Avatar Tuning Workflow](../docs/avatar-tuning-workflow.md) · [Blackfan Testing](../eval/blackfan-testing.md) · [Persona Behavior Checks](../eval/persona-behavior-checks.md)
|
||||
**Quick links:** [Research Hub](./README.md) · [Dual Closed-Loop Execution Chain](./dual-closed-loop-execution-chain.md) · [Runtime Posture Intensity Map](./runtime-posture-intensity-map.md) · [Structured Imperfection Theory](./structured-imperfection-theory.md) · [Output Governance Core](./output-governance-core.md) · [Shell-to-Runtime Mapping](./shell-to-runtime-mapping.md) · [Architecture Overview](./architecture-overview.md) · [Language Governance](./language-governance.md) · [WFGY_BRAIN Theory](./wfgy-brain-theory.md) · [Quickstart](../docs/quickstart.md) · [Boot Commands](../docs/boot-commands.md) · [Avatar Tuning Workflow](../docs/avatar-tuning-workflow.md) · [Blackfan Testing](../eval/blackfan-testing.md) · [Persona Behavior Checks](../eval/persona-behavior-checks.md)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -79,12 +87,10 @@ Without this page, readers may collapse both problems into a generic “quality
|
|||
That would miss the whole point.
|
||||
|
||||
The packed master separates these burdens.
|
||||
|
||||
The pre-emission floor gate is there to test whether the candidate still retains what higher law required it to retain.
|
||||
|
||||
Hard control is there to decide what may lawfully happen next.
|
||||
|
||||
This page exists to make that separation explicit.
|
||||
This page exists to make that separation explicit.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -124,18 +130,24 @@ This page is grounded primarily in the following packed-master sections:
|
|||
4. `0.P1 Operator execution trace sufficiency law`
|
||||
5. `0.P2 Recursive revision compatibility law`
|
||||
6. `4A.8A Pre-emission imperfection floor gate`
|
||||
7. `5D.16 Controller legality and shell distinction`
|
||||
8. `5D.17 Bounded recursion discipline`
|
||||
9. `5D.18 Anti-runaway-control law`
|
||||
10. `5D.19 Action mediation and anti-false-completion`
|
||||
11. `5D.20 Action mediation and anti-false-polish`
|
||||
12. `5D.21 Action mediation and theorem-facing honesty`
|
||||
13. `5D.22 Action mediation and downstream realization`
|
||||
14. `5D.23 Controller legality and dual-layer numeric relation`
|
||||
15. `5D.23A hard_control_candidate_knob_block`
|
||||
7. `5D.1 Part role`
|
||||
8. `5D.2 Why controller legality must exist as body`
|
||||
9. `5D.3 Controller legality identity`
|
||||
10. `5D.4 Controller-side operator-bearing structure`
|
||||
11. `5D.16 Controller legality and shell distinction`
|
||||
12. `5D.17 Bounded recursion discipline`
|
||||
13. `5D.18 Anti-runaway-control law`
|
||||
14. `5D.19 Action mediation and anti-false-completion`
|
||||
15. `5D.20 Action mediation and anti-false-polish`
|
||||
16. `5D.21 Action mediation and theorem-facing honesty`
|
||||
17. `5D.22 Action mediation and downstream realization`
|
||||
18. `5D.23 Controller legality and dual-layer numeric relation`
|
||||
19. `5D.23A hard_control_candidate_knob_block`
|
||||
20. `5D.23A1 hard_control profile control note`
|
||||
21. `5D.24 Formal-body honesty boundary at the end of Part 5D`
|
||||
|
||||
These anchors matter because this page is not inventing a late-stage governance story from general philosophy.
|
||||
The packed master already places pre-emission floor and hard control inside the execution-bearing route to lawful public emission.
|
||||
The packed master already places pre-emission floor and hard control inside the execution-bearing route to lawful public emission.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -159,7 +171,7 @@ Fifth, recursive revision does not bypass either gate.
|
|||
|
||||
Sixth, public emission is not earned by sounding finished.
|
||||
|
||||
That is why the packed master treats this region as a governed decision corridor rather than as a final wording zone.
|
||||
That is why the packed master treats this region as a governed decision corridor rather than as a final wording zone.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -183,7 +195,7 @@ It is:
|
|||
1. verify that lawful floor has not already collapsed
|
||||
2. only then allow controller-side action mediation to decide what may happen next
|
||||
|
||||
This makes the floor gate a condition of admissible late-stage action, not a decorative warning label.
|
||||
This makes the floor gate a condition of admissible late-stage action, not a decorative warning label.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -207,7 +219,7 @@ At minimum, the gate is protecting against failures such as:
|
|||
This is why the gate belongs with structured retention law rather than with final editing taste.
|
||||
|
||||
The object being guarded is not ugliness.
|
||||
The object being guarded is lawful retained life.
|
||||
The object being guarded is lawful retained life.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -233,7 +245,7 @@ It is a retention verdict.
|
|||
This distinction matters because many counterfeit outputs fail by looking better.
|
||||
If the system only looked at local readability, some of its most dangerous failures would pass.
|
||||
|
||||
The floor gate exists so that pre-emission success cannot be bought by lawful depletion.
|
||||
The floor gate exists so that pre-emission success cannot be bought by lawful depletion.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -265,7 +277,7 @@ A candidate may be fluent and still require redirect.
|
|||
A candidate may be elegant and still require stop.
|
||||
|
||||
So hard control is not there to reward what sounds most persuasive.
|
||||
It is there to decide what the corridor is lawfully allowed to do.
|
||||
It is there to decide what the corridor is lawfully allowed to do.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -292,42 +304,28 @@ Numeric support may help controller reading.
|
|||
It may not replace controller legality.
|
||||
|
||||
So hard control is not a scoreboard with a crown.
|
||||
It is a controller law that may use numeric attachment without surrendering judgment to it.
|
||||
It is a controller law that may use numeric attachment without surrendering judgment to it.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔩 The hard-control candidate knob family
|
||||
## 🔩 Controller legality must exist as body
|
||||
|
||||
The packed master explicitly preserves a hard-control candidate knob family.
|
||||
This part needs to be said more sharply.
|
||||
|
||||
These candidate parameters include:
|
||||
The packed master does not treat hard control as “reasonable behavior.”
|
||||
It treats controller legality as a real formal body.
|
||||
|
||||
1. `continue_threshold = 0.60`
|
||||
2. `revise_threshold = 0.48`
|
||||
3. `downgrade_threshold = 0.45`
|
||||
4. `stop_threshold = 0.30`
|
||||
5. `honesty_floor = 0.84`
|
||||
6. `pressure_transfer_legality_threshold = 0.60`
|
||||
7. `public_emission_suitability_threshold = 0.66`
|
||||
8. `open_item_block_threshold = 0.50`
|
||||
9. `unsupported_claim_block_threshold = 0.73`
|
||||
That matters because if controller legality remained only implied, the following false moves would become easy:
|
||||
|
||||
Their lawful meaning is bounded.
|
||||
1. whatever output path looks locally acceptable could be treated as lawful
|
||||
2. visible warnings could masquerade as actual mediation
|
||||
3. continuation could be assumed unless collapse looked obvious
|
||||
4. downgrade could be postponed because the prose still sounded composed
|
||||
5. redirect could be ignored because a locally coherent answer was still possible
|
||||
6. stop could be treated as a vibe rather than as a legal pathway
|
||||
|
||||
They expose carry-capable controller-facing thresholds and block conditions in explicit numeric form.
|
||||
|
||||
They do **not** do the following:
|
||||
|
||||
1. replace controller legality
|
||||
2. convert legality into ranking only
|
||||
3. authorize action by numeric presence alone
|
||||
4. erase the need for late-stage action mediation
|
||||
5. turn threshold passing into universal release entitlement
|
||||
|
||||
This is one of the clearest examples of the master body refusing fake math.
|
||||
|
||||
The numbers are real.
|
||||
But they are still subordinate to controller law.
|
||||
So Part 5D exists to stop theatrically justified after-the-fact choice.
|
||||
Its burden is to mediate lawful next-step action at the point of decision itself. :contentReference[oaicite:10]{index=10}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -359,7 +357,7 @@ Redirect may be required even when staying on route seems smoother.
|
|||
Stop may be required even when there is still more the system could say.
|
||||
|
||||
This is why anti-false-completion and anti-false-polish are attached to controller legality.
|
||||
The existence of another fluent sentence is not proof that lawful continue was earned.
|
||||
The existence of another fluent sentence is not proof that lawful continue was earned.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -386,7 +384,7 @@ But the lawful stop condition may already have been crossed.
|
|||
|
||||
That is why the packed master explicitly rejects runaway control.
|
||||
More text is not more legality.
|
||||
More recursive thought is not more permission.
|
||||
More recursive thought is not more permission.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -411,7 +409,78 @@ A clean answer may still hide controller failure.
|
|||
A composed paragraph may still have delayed the lawful stop.
|
||||
|
||||
So late-stage elegance is never enough.
|
||||
It remains auditable against controller legality.
|
||||
It remains auditable against controller legality.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎛️ The hard-control candidate knob family
|
||||
|
||||
The packed master explicitly preserves a hard-control candidate knob family.
|
||||
|
||||
These candidate parameters include:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `continue_threshold = 0.60`
|
||||
2. `revise_threshold = 0.48`
|
||||
3. `downgrade_threshold = 0.45`
|
||||
4. `stop_threshold = 0.30`
|
||||
5. `honesty_floor = 0.84`
|
||||
6. `pressure_transfer_legality_threshold = 0.60`
|
||||
7. `public_emission_suitability_threshold = 0.66`
|
||||
8. `open_item_block_threshold = 0.50`
|
||||
9. `unsupported_claim_block_threshold = 0.73`
|
||||
|
||||
Their lawful meaning is bounded.
|
||||
|
||||
They expose carry-capable controller-facing thresholds and block conditions in explicit numeric form.
|
||||
|
||||
They do **not** do the following:
|
||||
|
||||
1. replace controller legality
|
||||
2. convert legality into ranking only
|
||||
3. authorize action by numeric presence alone
|
||||
4. erase the need for late-stage action mediation
|
||||
5. turn threshold passing into universal release entitlement
|
||||
|
||||
This is one of the clearest examples of the master body refusing fake math.
|
||||
|
||||
The numbers are real.
|
||||
But they are still subordinate to controller law.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎚️ Hard-control profile binding at the launchpad layer
|
||||
|
||||
There is one more piece that should be explicit here.
|
||||
|
||||
The candidate knob family of `hard_control` is allowed to remain answerable to the launchpad-facing central TXT toggle block through **profile selection only**.
|
||||
|
||||
At the present release stage, the lawful launchpad-facing binding is:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `hard_control_profile = minimum | baseline | standard | strong`
|
||||
|
||||
This matters because it gives the system a bounded way to vary controller posture severity without pretending controller legality itself is optional.
|
||||
|
||||
The role of this binding is narrow.
|
||||
|
||||
It may lawfully:
|
||||
|
||||
1. alter controller posture severity within lawful profile range
|
||||
2. support replay comparison across stricter and lighter controller pressure
|
||||
3. support threshold-family testing without deleting controller identity
|
||||
4. support stage-bounded profile calibration for public-emission posture
|
||||
|
||||
It may not lawfully:
|
||||
|
||||
1. switch `hard_control` into unsupported absence
|
||||
2. convert controller legality into optional decoration
|
||||
3. authorize public emission by profile softness alone
|
||||
4. collapse legality into score-only ranking
|
||||
5. erase honesty-floor answerability
|
||||
6. erase block-threshold answerability
|
||||
|
||||
So profile softness is not an escape hatch.
|
||||
The profile may tune controller posture.
|
||||
It may not rewrite controller existence into casual switchability. :contentReference[oaicite:15]{index=15}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -435,7 +504,7 @@ This is especially important in public-facing artifact production.
|
|||
|
||||
The closer the system gets to releasable output, the easier it becomes to confuse finished appearance with lawful eligibility.
|
||||
|
||||
This page exists to reject that shortcut.
|
||||
This page exists to reject that shortcut.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -468,7 +537,32 @@ If this layer is missing, weakened, or misunderstood, several failure classes be
|
|||
richer downstream realization is allowed to mask upstream controller illegality
|
||||
|
||||
These are not style defects.
|
||||
They are governance failures.
|
||||
They are governance failures.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📍 What this page is, and what it is not
|
||||
|
||||
This page **is**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. a release-corridor law page
|
||||
2. a pre-emission-floor page
|
||||
3. a controller-legality page
|
||||
4. a boundary page between retained life and later action mediation
|
||||
|
||||
This page is **not**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. a generic quality-check page
|
||||
2. a runtime-posture page
|
||||
3. an output-governance page
|
||||
4. a WFGY_BRAIN page
|
||||
5. a pure numeric-threshold page
|
||||
6. a total theorem-facing closure page
|
||||
|
||||
That separation is deliberate.
|
||||
|
||||
If this page tried to do all of those jobs at once, it would stop being a real pre-emission and hard-control page and become a compressed counterfeit of the larger body.
|
||||
This page is not allowed to do that.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -486,6 +580,7 @@ It is strong enough to preserve:
|
|||
6. anti-runaway-control discipline
|
||||
7. numeric attachment without numeric sovereignty
|
||||
8. distinct late-stage action pathways
|
||||
9. profile selection without controller optionality
|
||||
|
||||
At the same time, this page does **not** lawfully claim:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -497,9 +592,7 @@ At the same time, this page does **not** lawfully claim:
|
|||
So the lawful current-stage claim is strong, but bounded.
|
||||
|
||||
This corridor is explicit, ordered, action-bearing, and anti-counterfeit.
|
||||
It is not being sold here as finished universal finality.
|
||||
|
||||
That restraint is part of its force.
|
||||
It is not being sold here as finished universal finality.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -512,15 +605,16 @@ If this page is your first release-corridor research entry, the best next steps
|
|||
3. read [Structured Imperfection Theory](./structured-imperfection-theory.md) for the retention layer protected by the floor gate
|
||||
4. read [Runtime Posture Intensity Map](./runtime-posture-intensity-map.md) for runtime-floor and conflict relation
|
||||
5. read [Shell-to-Runtime Mapping](./shell-to-runtime-mapping.md) for bounded upstream handoff law
|
||||
6. read [Architecture Overview](./architecture-overview.md) for the larger system skeleton
|
||||
7. read [Language Governance](./language-governance.md) for the governance claim behind lawful behavior
|
||||
8. read [WFGY_BRAIN Theory](./wfgy-brain-theory.md) for editable behavior context
|
||||
6. read [Output Governance Core](./output-governance-core.md) for the earlier downstream shaping layer
|
||||
7. read [Architecture Overview](./architecture-overview.md) for the larger system skeleton
|
||||
8. read [Language Governance](./language-governance.md) for the governance claim behind lawful behavior
|
||||
9. read [WFGY_BRAIN Theory](./wfgy-brain-theory.md) for editable behavior context
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔗 Related pages
|
||||
|
||||
**Research:** [Research Hub](./README.md) · [Dual Closed-Loop Execution Chain](./dual-closed-loop-execution-chain.md) · [Runtime Posture Intensity Map](./runtime-posture-intensity-map.md) · [Structured Imperfection Theory](./structured-imperfection-theory.md) · [Shell-to-Runtime Mapping](./shell-to-runtime-mapping.md) · [Architecture Overview](./architecture-overview.md) · [Language Governance](./language-governance.md) · [WFGY_BRAIN Theory](./wfgy-brain-theory.md)
|
||||
**Research:** [Research Hub](./README.md) · [Dual Closed-Loop Execution Chain](./dual-closed-loop-execution-chain.md) · [Runtime Posture Intensity Map](./runtime-posture-intensity-map.md) · [Structured Imperfection Theory](./structured-imperfection-theory.md) · [Output Governance Core](./output-governance-core.md) · [Shell-to-Runtime Mapping](./shell-to-runtime-mapping.md) · [Architecture Overview](./architecture-overview.md) · [Language Governance](./language-governance.md) · [WFGY_BRAIN Theory](./wfgy-brain-theory.md)
|
||||
|
||||
**Docs:** [Quickstart](../docs/quickstart.md) · [Boot Commands](../docs/boot-commands.md) · [Avatar Tuning Workflow](../docs/avatar-tuning-workflow.md)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue