mirror of
https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY.git
synced 2026-05-01 21:11:11 +00:00
Create retrieval-traceability.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
693317d655
commit
122ebba1ae
1 changed files with 68 additions and 0 deletions
68
ProblemMap/retrieval-traceability.md
Normal file
68
ProblemMap/retrieval-traceability.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
|||
# 🧠 Retrieval Traceability Failure
|
||||
|
||||
Modern RAG systems often fail not because they retrieve the wrong chunk — but because the user cannot trace **why** a certain response was generated.
|
||||
This breaks interpretability, makes debugging painful, and erodes user trust.
|
||||
|
||||
WFGY is built to bring reasoning and retrieval traceability to the surface.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧨 Symptoms
|
||||
|
||||
- You don’t know what part of the chunk led to the answer
|
||||
- Model combines multiple chunks but you can’t inspect how
|
||||
- Slight prompt change causes wild output shifts
|
||||
- Impossible to tell whether answer came from context, model memory, or hallucination
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## ❌ Why This Happens
|
||||
|
||||
- Vector similarity scores ≠ logic contribution
|
||||
- No semantic map between input → logic → output
|
||||
- Embeddings are opaque; trees don’t exist
|
||||
- ΔS shifts happen but aren’t tracked
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## ✅ WFGY Solution
|
||||
|
||||
WFGY builds a **visible semantic trace** of every reasoning step. You can see:
|
||||
|
||||
| Traceability Problem | Module | Solution |
|
||||
|----------------------|--------|----------|
|
||||
| No clue what chunk influenced what | Tree engine | Shows logic nodes linked to source |
|
||||
| No way to inspect logic steps | BBPF (Progression Forks) | Step-by-step reasoning trace |
|
||||
| Blended logic from multiple sources | Residue detection (BBMC) | Flags corrupted logic paths |
|
||||
| Hidden model shortcuts or bluffing | ΔS + λ_observe gates | Stops and asks for clarification |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧪 Example Use
|
||||
|
||||
> Question: *"What is the ethical implication of autonomous weapons?"*
|
||||
|
||||
You gave it a full document dump, but aren’t sure which part led to the final answer.
|
||||
|
||||
- WFGY:
|
||||
- Shows Tree trace: → `Node_3B: "Lethal AI use"` → `Node_4A: "No human oversight"`
|
||||
- ΔS threshold drop marks where logic drifted
|
||||
- BBCR suggests rerouting to a stable branch or prompts for clarification
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📦 Current Status
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | Status |
|
||||
|---------|--------|
|
||||
| Full logic trace | ✅ Implemented |
|
||||
| ΔS map over time | ✅ Implemented |
|
||||
| Chunk → node linking | ✅ Implemented |
|
||||
| GUI inspector | 🔜 In design phase |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔗 Related Links
|
||||
|
||||
- [WFGY – Semantic Reasoning Engine](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY)
|
||||
- [TXT OS – Tree Memory System](https://github.com/onestardao/WFGY/tree/main/OS)
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue