mirror of
https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView.git
synced 2026-05-06 09:55:27 +00:00
c19a33ee1c
Adopt RaBitQ-style binary sketches as a first-class cheap similarity sensor at four points in the RuView pipeline: AETHER re-ID hot-cache filter, per-room novelty / drift detection, mesh-exchange compression, and privacy-preserving event logs. Implementation home is ruvector-core::quantization::BinaryQuantized (already vendored, already SIMD-accelerated NEON+POPCNT, 32x compression, 1-bit sign quantization + hamming distance), re-exported through a thin RuView-flavored API in wifi-densepose-ruvector::sketch. Pattern at every site: dense embedding -> RaBitQ sketch -> hamming pre-filter to top-K -> full-precision refinement only on miss. Decision boundary unchanged; sketch is a sensor that gates *which* comparisons run, not *what* they decide. Acceptance test (per source proposal): - sketch compare cost reduction: 8x-30x vs full float - top-K candidate coverage: >= 90% agreement with full-float pass - end-to-end accuracy regression: < 1 percentage point Site-by-site rollback if any criterion fails at a given site; remaining sites continue. Five implementation passes, each independently testable: ruvector module wrap, AETHER re-ID pre-filter, cluster-Pi novelty sensor, mesh-exchange compression, privacy log. Sensor MCU unchanged; sketches happen at the cluster Pi (ADR-083). Validation requires acceptance numbers on >= 3 of 5 passes. Open question (out-of-scope until pass-1 benchmark): whether RuView embeddings need a Johnson-Lindenstrauss / RaBitQ-paper randomized rotation before sign-quantization, or whether pure 1-bit sign quantization (today's BinaryQuantized) is sufficient. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| adr | ||
| ddd | ||
| edge-modules | ||
| huggingface | ||
| qe-reports | ||
| research | ||
| tutorials | ||
| build-guide.md | ||
| security-audit-wasm-edge-vendor.md | ||
| TROUBLESHOOTING.md | ||
| user-guide.md | ||
| wifi-mat-user-guide.md | ||
| WITNESS-LOG-028.md | ||